0:00
/
Transcript

Should race matter in college admissions?

On the premiere episode of The Argument, Matthew Yglesias and Jerusalem Demsas argue about the effectiveness of affirmative action.

The Supreme Court formally rejected affirmative action in college admissions in the 2023 case of Students for Fair Admissions vs Harvard, but the legal case did not resolve the larger dispute in American society or necessarily end schools’ efforts to manipulate the ethnic composition of their classes.

New research from David Broockman and Josh Kalla indicates that moving to the center on this topic is the single most potent thing that Democrats can do to improve their electoral standing, and the second-best issue they found was on the closely related topic of racial targeting of small business assistance. I covered the research in a recent New York Times op-ed and, of course, have many times made the case for a pragmatic move to the center.

But people also care about the substance and the merits of the issue, not just the politics, so Jerusalem Demsas and I debated it for the debut episode of our new Podcast.

Share

“In a basic way,” I argue in the episode, “it is not a good idea to be slotting people into racial and ethnic categories and judging them on that basis. It’s not fair to people, and it’s not healthy for society.”

Jerusalem takes the other side, making the case that nobody has a moral right to slots at specific colleges and that representation at elite school has important downstream consequences for society at large.

WATCH THE EPISODE HERE

New episodes post every Thursday.

You can find The Argument on Substack, YouTube, and wherever you get your podcasts.

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Overcast | Pocket Casts

Further reading:

Diversifying Society’s Leaders? The Determinants and Causal Effects of Admission to Highly Selective Private Colleges” by Raj Chetty, David J. Deming, and John N. Friedman

Breaking Systemic Barriers: Being Black in the Aquatic Sciences and Related Fields” by Lauren Pharr

Smartphones, Online Music Streaming, and Traffic Fatalities” by Vishal R. Patel, Christopher M. Worsham, Michael Liu, and Anupam B. Jena

Corrections:

  • At 0:05:36, Matt says “LSAT flunk rates” when he means “bar exam flunk rates.”

  • At 0:07:06, Jerusalem says “data from Sander’s” when she means “data from Sander’s critics.”

  • At 0:18:46, Jerusalem says Raj Chetty’s data shows that attending an elite school “doubles” the likelihood of reaching the top income quintile when she means “increases by 50%.”

Show notes:

(Illustration by The Argument, image by Harvard University)

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?