I can’t figure out how to watch “non-live” in the Substack app - is that possible? Was really looking forward to viewing this but was busy at the live time. Pesky employment!
Where exactly on the substack app do I find this discussion? I am subscribed to both Slow Boring and Silver Bulletin, but other than the scheduling announcement, information to how to view this event through the app is sorely lacking.
UUU! it looks like the app is only for cell phones! I'd like to listen (although I generally do prefer to read), but not at the cost of putting another damn app on the phone!
Question: Is the election outcome already determined, but simply impossible for us to know given the inherent imprecision of the available metrics (especially polls)? Or is the outcome genuinely undetermined, with a sufficient number of potential voters in each of the pivotal states truly undecided about whether to vote at all and, if so, for whom to vote?
Nate called for Biden to be replaced. That appears to have been a good call. I’m curious what would a River Political strategist he have done in the last two years to improve the chances of beating Trump so that everyone wasn’t sweating it out until the end.
I am wondering about the implied ticket splitting and significantly higher rates of undecideds in polls that include both the presidential and senate race.
This might not end up being the correct venue, and even if it is, there might not be enough time for the type of depth that I'm curious about. But even if this is better for a Nate/Matt discussion in the future, I want to at least put a pin on this in hopes that the two of them see it and consider it.
Anyway, I would be very eager to hear a point/counterpoint discussion on the topic of gambling between Nate and Matt, as for Nate it's obviously a big part of his life, whereas Matt has grown increasingly negative of it in recent times. My curiosity is what points of agreement and disagreement they'd have on gambling, and what type of equilibrium could result from their combined views.
Nate will say that he doesn’t gamble. Sure there is uncertainty in poker, and many people are gambling when they play poker, but people who take it seriously aren’t.
I can’t figure out how to watch “non-live” in the Substack app - is that possible? Was really looking forward to viewing this but was busy at the live time. Pesky employment!
I couldn’t find this in the app
Is there any way to watch this after the fact? I was busy yesterday and thought I could just watch or listen later, but that seems to not be the case.
So this is a conversation I'd love to listen to. We're all paying subscribers - but is there no way for us to access a replay anywhere?
Where can we listen to this on demand? Is it recorded somewhere?
+1
I’m on my phone and I can’t get in
maybe he’ll post the replay
How do I hide the comment stream on the video? This sucks
Where exactly on the substack app do I find this discussion? I am subscribed to both Slow Boring and Silver Bulletin, but other than the scheduling announcement, information to how to view this event through the app is sorely lacking.
UUU! it looks like the app is only for cell phones! I'd like to listen (although I generally do prefer to read), but not at the cost of putting another damn app on the phone!
I just wish it would allow me to find notes I have posted
Question: Is the election outcome already determined, but simply impossible for us to know given the inherent imprecision of the available metrics (especially polls)? Or is the outcome genuinely undetermined, with a sufficient number of potential voters in each of the pivotal states truly undecided about whether to vote at all and, if so, for whom to vote?
Is Schrodinger's cat dead or alive?
That depends. Do you subscribe to the Copenhagen interpretation, Many Worlds Theory, some kind of hidden variables theory, or something else?
1) What if any laws should there be about AI
2) Which of these Star Trek technologies would disrupt society more, “the computer”, the Holodeck, replicators, or warp drive?
3) Which of those would you personally want to have the most?
4) If you could be in the Harris administration, what job would you want?
5) Talk about conspiracy theories and which ones you like / dislike!!!
Nate called for Biden to be replaced. That appears to have been a good call. I’m curious what would a River Political strategist he have done in the last two years to improve the chances of beating Trump so that everyone wasn’t sweating it out until the end.
I am wondering about the implied ticket splitting and significantly higher rates of undecideds in polls that include both the presidential and senate race.
This might not end up being the correct venue, and even if it is, there might not be enough time for the type of depth that I'm curious about. But even if this is better for a Nate/Matt discussion in the future, I want to at least put a pin on this in hopes that the two of them see it and consider it.
Anyway, I would be very eager to hear a point/counterpoint discussion on the topic of gambling between Nate and Matt, as for Nate it's obviously a big part of his life, whereas Matt has grown increasingly negative of it in recent times. My curiosity is what points of agreement and disagreement they'd have on gambling, and what type of equilibrium could result from their combined views.
Nate will say that he doesn’t gamble. Sure there is uncertainty in poker, and many people are gambling when they play poker, but people who take it seriously aren’t.
+1
Give him some ideas for what to focus on when Election season is done, we need nerd content that's not sports. Economic forecasting, etc, something.