Discussion about this post

User's avatar
evan bear's avatar

The Amar-Amar (Amars?) argument seems pretty obviously correct to me. The Constitution was using "legislature" as a synecdoche for the "state's democratic lawmaking process as prescribed by its constitution." We still do this to this day! We always say things like "Congress enacted the Affordable Care Act" when obviously Obama still needed to sign it and the Supreme Court could have struck it down if it wanted to (and almost did). For Alito et al. to buy into ISL would be the same mode of reasoning as interpreting Article VI Section 4's "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government" as, well, you know.

Expand full comment
M M's avatar

Hah, I didn't realize this wasn't a Matt-post until I got to "my parents were born citizens of an independent India," at which point I was quite confused

Great post Milan. I had never heard of this and it's interesting, and definitely concerning, to learn of

My one bit of critical feedback (as is tradition now, I suppose?): I think it would have been helpful to have caption on the image of election results that illustrates gerrymandering, since it takes reading through a clump of numbers and making an inference to understand the point. A brief something pointing out that Republicans have lost the popular votes but won more seats in each would have made it an easier read

Expand full comment
89 more comments...

No posts