Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ray's avatar

One thing I always find unique about US policy debates is the bipartisan consensus that there are no programs that should be paid for by broad taxation. Everything from BBB to Medicare for all should be covered by targeted taxes on the wealthy (or shouldn’t exist to facilitate lower taxes in the wealthy if you are in the GOP). The obvious ‘fix’ for both Medicare & Social Security is a bump in the payroll tax, but somehow that is more toxic than cutting those programs.

I do wonder if Democrats should start talking about investing in major programs to lay the groundwork for more sustainable funding mechanisms in future debates - otherwise I feel like a lot of the welfare state gains of the last decade will be pared back in the coming ‘fiscal responsibility’ movement.

Expand full comment
InMD's avatar

I wish I could triple like this one. While being of the opinion that the ACA didn't go far enough, due to the nature of the American political system (Madisonian, federalized) it is the best path towards improving healthcare police, coverage, and access, and I hate how much of an orphan it's become.

Just to give a small example that I think people take for granted, the ACA, by getting more people covered with some kind of insurance with stronger minimal coverage requirements, plus a bunch of incentives in the ARRA, has been the driver of the massive expansion we've seen of retail-like urgent care centers and similar clinics. It's mundane, and they aren't perfect, but they are also enormously important for supply side.

Anyway I think it's important to make peace with the idea that healthcare is always going to look a little different here than Europe, always be a little more tiered, and a little more commercial in nature. But there's just no case for trying to take it away. The near miss on repeal shows just how flat out bad the GOP is on policy, both because it's completely unconstructive with respect to real problems and also because it has no ideas whatsoever (remember, it was repeal and replace, but replace with what? no one ever said).

Expand full comment
264 more comments...

No posts