Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ace of Bayes's avatar

The setting for the finding that legalized gambling doesn’t reduce illegal gambling is the lottery. The current setting is legalized SPORTS betting. It seems much more plausible to me that legalized sports betting will reduce illegal sports betting in a much more significant way. “More plausible to me” is not the same thing as “true,” of course, but much of your argument seems to rest on the lack of illegal-to-legal substitution. I think there are good reasons to question whether the lottery finding is generalizeable to other types of gambling.

Expand full comment
Marie Kennedy's avatar

Milan, I genuinely applaud your willingness to put your ideas out here to the SB crowd, even if they give you crap about them.

Expand full comment
245 more comments...

No posts