Discussion about this post

User's avatar
dysphemistic treadmill's avatar

Hard-boiled Matt:

"...life just is the way it is and has the meaning (or lack thereof) that it has. So there’s nothing to be sad about."

Emo Matt:

“it’s good for human beings to exist and flourish.”

I suspect your real position is that the goodness of human flourishing is a basic source of value and meaning for human lives: human life is not meaningless, but instead meaningful in itself, not in virtue of depending on some larger (eg theological) structure of meaning.

Meaning is like value in this respect: when we say that human flourishing is valuable in itself, not because it contributes to the socialist revolution or the GDP, we are saying that it really is valuable, even though it does not depend for that value on some larger structure of value. It's non-derivatively valuable, and non-derivatively meaningful.

This might sadden people who wanted human value to be grounded in a grander story about our central place in divine creation (eg) or our leadership in the future intergalactic federation. To them you say: no need to look for a meaning external to human flourishing, when that itself is the source of meaning. No reason to be sad about the lack of an external grounding: it's meaningful in itself.

There is still plenty to be sad about on other grounds, mostly the gap between how few human lives go well and how many human lives could go well if we did all of this stuff (govt, economy, society, etc) a bit better. But responding to that gap with hope and motivation is better than responding to it with (mere) sadness.

Expand full comment
Estate of Bob Saget's avatar

So carried interest was put in just so Sinema could reject and counter it with stock buy back tax? Dems finally not bottling something for once?

Expand full comment
275 more comments...

No posts