Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zach's avatar

I think it’s pretty wild that McCarthy could give a farewell speech to his caucus where he explicitly admitted the Democrats tried to intervene on his behalf but he refused and said he would rather get ousted than “sell his soul” and work with the other party, and then could walk out from that speech directly to a press conference where he proceeded to blame Democrats for not saving him, and the reporters who knew what he had said to his caucus didn’t say a word to call him on it.

Goes to show how dishonest he is, and how deficient a lot of Hill reporting is.

Expand full comment
Lost Future's avatar

Reminder that parliamentary countries with a history of past instability (like Germany) require a 'constructive vote of no confidence' for this exact reason. You can't remove the existing Prime Minister without either having a replacement in mind, or early elections. In the Weimar era it was easy for parties to agree to dump the current PM, but hard or impossible to get them to coordinate on an alternative..... They too had a chaos caucus that just wanted to watch the world burn (and eventually, succeeded!) Would be a helpful rule to have here in the US

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_vote_of_no_confidence

Expand full comment
359 more comments...

No posts